.
 
.

Truth in Virtue of Meaning

.
Redna cena: 88,78 €
Predvideni rok dobave: 14-21 dni
.
.
Količina:  
.
Strošek dostave je enoten za celo Slovenijo in znaša 2,95 €, ne glede na količino in vrsto kupljenih izdelkov.

Številni izdelki imajo oznako "brezplačna dostava", kar pomeni, da v prmeru nakupa takšnega izdelka poštnine ne boste plačali. 

Več o dostavi
Emka.si omogoča naslednje načine plačila:
  • z gotovino ob prevzemu (velja le za fizične osebe),
  • s plačilno oziroma kreditno kartico (Mastercard, Visa, ActivaMaestro, Activa, Diners, American Express),
  • s storitvijo Moneta (Mobitel in Simobil)
  • Plačilo po predračunu (pravne osebe)
  • Račun z odlogom plačila (za javna podjetja)
Več o plačilih

Pri vsakem izdelku je naveden predviden rok dostave. Glede na to katere izdelke izberete, se vam pri oddaji naročila prikaže tudi končni predviden datum dobave vašega pakete.

Večino izdelkov dostavljamo iz lastne zaloge, zato so naši dobavni roki zelo kratki.

Ko vam bomo poslali paket boste o tem obveščeni tudi po emailu. V emailu bo navedena številka vašega paketa ter povezava do Pošte Slovenije, kjer boste lahko preverili natančen status dostave.

Več o dostavi

To je spletna cena
Shrani v seznam želja
.

.

Opis

The analytic/synthetic distinction looks simple. It is a distinction between two different kinds of sentence. Synthetic sentences are true in part because of the way the world is, and in part because of what they mean. Analytic sentences - like all bachelors are unmarried and triangles have three sides - are different. They are true in virtue of meaning, so no matter what the world is like, as long as the sentence means what it does, it will be true.
This distinction seems powerful because analytic sentences seem to be knowable in a special way. One can know that all bachelors are unmarried, for example, just by thinking about what it means. But many twentieth-century philosophers, with Quine in the lead, argued that there were no analytic sentences, that the idea of analyticity didn't even make sense, and that the analytic/synthetic distinction was therefore an illusion. Others couldn't see how there could fail to be a distinction, however ingenious the arguments of Quine and his supporters.
But since the heyday of the debate, things have changed in the philosophy of language. Tools have been refined, confusions cleared up, and most significantly, many philosophers now accept a view of language - semantic externalism - on which it is possible to see how the distinction could fail. One might be tempted to think that ultimately the distinction has fallen for reasons other than those proposed in the original debate.
In Truth in Virtue of Meaning, Gillian Russell argues that it hasn't. Using the tools of contemporary philosophy of language, she outlines a view of analytic sentences which is compatible with semantic externalism and defends that view against the old Quinean arguments. She then goes on to draw out the surprising epistemological consequences of her approach.
.
.
Oglejte si ostale knjige tega avtorja
.
.
Oglejte si vse knjige tega avtorja
.

O avtorju - Gillian Russell

Obvestite me o novi knjigi tega avtorja

Želite, da vas po elektronski pošti obvestimo, ko izide nova knjiga ali ponatis katere od knjig tega avtorja?

DA - obveščajte me o novostih avtorja
.
.
.
.

Podrobnosti o izdelku

Mnenja kupcev

  0  ocen:
5 zvezdice
0%
(0)
4 zvezdice
0%
(0)
3 zvezdice
0%
(0)
2 zvezdice
0%
(0)
1 zvezdica
0%
(0)
Povprečna ocena kupcev:
Ocena kupcev: 0
(0 ocen uporabnikov )
.
Ocenite izdelek s klikom na zvezdice:
 
.
.
.
.
.

Oznake kupcev o tem izdelku

Kliknite na posamezno oznako za prikaz vseh izdelkov označenih s to oznako:

Dodaj oznako:

Dodaj
.